Trust / editorial process

Editorial policy

The editorial policy keeps the academy useful, transparent and independent. It is a practical standard for writing and reviewing evergreen market education, calculators and future updates.

TRUST
NOTE
Clear terms.
Visible limits.

Sources and evidence

When a claim depends on a current rule, product specification, company result or network detail, the writer should start with a primary source such as a regulator, filing, official documentation or exchange contract specification. Secondary sources can provide context but should not replace the original document when it is available.

Corrections and updates

A correction should identify the page, the inaccurate or unclear statement and the source that supports the change. Material updates should carry a visible review date in the production version. Market data, regulations and product rules can change, so time-sensitive language must be labelled.

Commercial independence

The academy should disclose affiliate links, sponsorships, paid placements or commercial relationships near the relevant recommendation or link. Commercial relationships must not be presented as neutral evidence, and no partner receives a guaranteed positive review.

Writing standards

Use plain language, define jargon, show assumptions, avoid guaranteed outcomes and include a meaningful downside or uncertainty section. Do not publish personalised trade instructions, fake testimonials, copied material or urgency-led claims.